President Donald Trump’s advisors say they’ll advise him to put the kibosh on a bill Democrats have crafted to reinstate Obama-eraprotections, if the bill ever makes it to his desk.
The Office of Management and Budget on Monday sent out a statement saying it would “strongly oppose” HR 1644, the “made the letter available in a tweet.,” which codifies the controversial 2015 net neutrality rules, according to a statement sent to lawmakers sponsoring the legislation. OMB, which administers the federal budget and advises the president on how to run executive branch agencies,
The statement was sent the day before the House of Representatives, controlled by Democrats, is. HR 1644 would prevent broadband providers from blocking or throttling access to the internet and would prevent these companies from charging fees to access the internet faster. in a 2017 vote, arguing that the rules had stifled investment because the rules imposed utility-style regulation on the internet.
OMB said in its statement that the legislation would nullify the FCC’s effort to restore a “light touch” approach to regulation and would tie the hands of the FCC to adapt its regulation in the future.
“Last year, the FCC returned to the light-touch regulatory scheme that enabled the internet to develop and thrive for nearly two decades by promoting internet freedom and encouraging network investment,” it said.
The letter went on to say that if the bill was passed, it would undermine gains in broadband download speeds and fiber deployments experienced in 2018.
“If HR 1644 were presented to the president, his advisers would recommend that he veto it,” the letter concludes.
The bill is expected to pass the Democrat-controlled House, but it faces an uphill battle in the Senate, where Republicans hold a majority. That said, Democrats were able to pass athat would’ve repealed the FCC’s order to dismantle the 2015 rules.
Whether Trump will take the advice of the OMB is anyone’s guess. He hasn’t said much publicly about net neutrality, although he’s been a big proponent of deregulation in general.
Last month,he didn’t “see any reason he’d veto it.” He continued that net neutrality is not a partisan issue, and he said that most Americans support the rules.
“I don’t know the president’s personal views on net neutrality,” he said. “I would assume that like most Americans he’s for it … The only place this bill is controversial is in Washington, DC.”
Doyle didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on the OMB’s statement.
But Republicans say the bill gives far too much power to the Federal Communications Commission, which they fear could result in the government setting broadband rates.
Republicans, like Rep. Greg Walden of Oregon, complained during debate in the Energy and Commerce Committee markup of the bill that the Democrats’ solution was not something that most Americans support. He called on colleagues to come up with a compromise.
“This, my friends, is not the net neutrality that people want,” he said. “It’s actually more government socialism and frankly it’s worse.”